Category Archives: Food Security

GM Foods In a Different Light

GM Foods have been lauded as the silver bullet that will save the world or reviled as “Frankenfoods”. The truth, of course, is at neither of these extremes.  The Atlantic’s excellent article on Golden Rice shows a nuanced and ultimately winning picture. In particular, the public-private partnership that is guiding this project toward delivery of seeds to poor farmers, free of license, is a fitting reply to those who think that the word “Monsanto” is an adequate reason for their rigid opposition to the adoption of biotechnology.

Food Price Rise: here it comes

So all the reassurances about there being no repeat of the 2008 food price scare were not accurate after all.  The USDA reports a steep rise in the price of corn, wheat and soybeans fueled partly by shortfalls in production at home and globally (mainly due to weather factors in Russia and other countries), and rising demand for grains in surging economies like India and China. It is only a matter of time before consumers start seeing this price rise in the grocery stores as the impact trickles down.

Global Hunger Index

There is some good news from the fight on global hunger. Progress has been made toward achieving the Millennium Development Goal to halve the number of hungry people in the world by 2015, reports IFPRI, and South Asia , in particular, has made a significant move forward. However, Sub-Saharan Africa continues to display alarming trends.  Childhood malnutrition is a big  contributor to the Global Hunger Index. The window for rectifying this is the period during gestation and the first two years after birth. After this, the effects of under nutrition cannot be reversed.  This brings to mind the peanut wonder paste, Plumpy’nut which has been brought into use with great results for infants  in many countries, most recently in the aftermath of the earthquake in Haiti.  More on its benefits and also controversies, here.

GM Foods: another view

Time  magazine has an interesting article on the GM foods that are already in the market. I wanted to post this because many people I speak to seem unaware that GM foods are already available and indeed, we have been consuming them already. The example of Golden Rice is important because it highlights  a point often lost in angry din of the GM debate: genetic modification is a technology which can be safely used as so many other technologies are used.  It is not essential that a giant corporation be the sole provider of this technology  and hence gain monopoly control over the crop. Biotechnology can also be developed by research organizations, governments, non-profits etc. and the benefits of this technology can be reaped by farmers and consumers alike.

Wheat Crisis Update

Earlier reactions on the Russian wheat crisis seemed encouraging. As I wrote then, the problem would be contained as other countries, apparently,  were in a position to pick up the slack.  Now the U.N. reports that the situation is somewhat volatile because consumers fear a repeat of 2008 with shortages and high prices. There is also increased hoarding and speculation fueling higher wheat prices. Such crises are going to be more common in the future with climate change playing a big role. Consider the situation in Pakistan where floods have washed away  crops, and destroyed wheat seed stocks. The  planting season is here and there  is a dearth of seeds. In water-logged areas planting seeds, even if there are any available , is not possible. In a country where wheat is a staple food, this will unleash unmet demand and escalating prices which would have an impact elsewhere as well.

The Price of Sustainable Living

The FDA is going through the process of consultations and public meetings to ascertain if a newly developed strain of genetically modified salmon is suitable for human consumption. There are also reports from Europe on the success of breeding the endangered bluefin tuna. The first news was greeted by the usual scary warnings about “fish-zilla” and “frankenfish” while the second has been termed abhorrent because we are breeding the fish merely to satisfy our own greed. Let us set aside for the time being the question of the safety or viability of either technique and consider a very simple  issue: the arrogance of a species that seeks to reorganize the planet to fit its own needs. We have eaten the bluefin to extinction and are reviving them to satisfy our appetites and we are trying to re-engineer the salmon so it grows faster to keep up with our demands.  What if we thought  instead about what we could be doing with humans?  How about moderating our behavior instead? Instead of farming salmon fed on corn, we could we eat less fish and more plants. Or instead of finding spending huge amounts of money trying to breed a species solely to consume them, lets spend instead on creating awareness of the need to stop overpopulating the planet.

This is not fear mongering, we are on a slippery slope of no return so why is there no will to do what is needed? Because, sadly, a sustainable planet is the ultimate public good. We would all like it, no one wants to perish , but we figure there are plenty of others to make the sacrifices, the outcome will not depend on the actions of a single individual so we take the easy path out. So, very few people actually do the right thing and the possibility of a negative outcome grows. These are hard times, we say, give me a break. A break, a bargain, call it what you will, just inches up the price of a sustainable future for our children just that much higher and pulls it that extra distance away from our empty hands.

Think twice before you act and share your concerns with others, remember we need to get everyone to act responsibly.This is a huge task and its going to take a planet to do it.

The Great Locavore Battle

It’s on! The battle to define and support /oppose the locavore movement was kicked off today. Stephen Budiansky in his piece for The New York Times, “Math Lessons for the Locavore” while noting that he was all for growing your own veggies, pointed out what he calls the “absurdities” of this trend. The gauntlet was picked up over at Grist by Ken Meter of the Crossroads Resource Center who argued that the locavore movement is crucial to fixing our broken food system. Now, you be the judge! And stay tuned, there is more to come!

How to bring in a Food Revolution

Anna Lappe’s article for Grist examines the pillars the food revolution should be based on: she identifies them as Ecology, Community and Fairness. What resonated with me, in particular, is the approach to thinking about food in a comprehensive way. For instance the decision to eat shrimp should be determined not only by personal health concerns but also on how the shrimp are harvested and their place in the food system; and finally on whether those associated with the shrimp industry are being fairly treated. Are the shrimp farmers/fisher people getting a fair wage? Are we literally wolfing up all the shrimp on the planet? It might taste good and even be good for you but its time to consider whole equation : the global good.

What is a seed vault anyway?

I wrote about the Russian seed bank yesterday and then chanced upon this amazing film from the National Geographic on the Svalbard seed bank in the Arctic .

Russia Wheat Crisis Update

The International Food Policy Research Institute just posted their briefing on the Russia wheat crisis. They seem to conclude that there is no reason to fear steep price hikes.