Category Archives: Food Safety

When is a Centrist a Radical?

 

The answer, according to James E. Mcwilliams, is the moment when you enter the domain of food and take up position in the middle. In his book, “Just Food” he notes how polarizing the food wars can be: either you are a diehard supporter of organic farming or you are a “frankenfood” fan. “The dull but respectable place called the center” he finds, is a lonely place.

The subtitle of the book is “Where Locavores get it wrong and how we can truly eat responsibly” and this goes against the current push towards buying and eating locally. I started out with some scepticism but his essential arguement is convincing : eating locally may be a good plan on a personal level but we are not going to be able to solve the problems of the food system at the global level by eating and growing  only local, organic food. The book is an easy read, the evidence is presented in an accessible way. So, pick it  up if you can and see if you agree that “To be a centrist when it comes to food is, unfortunately, to be a radical.

Food Safety Bill Update

Early Christmas present : The Senate unanimously passed the Food Safety Bill today!

Food Safety Bill Passes!!

Celebrate! And read about it here, as reported by the New York Times. It has a cool map which shows how the voting happened so you can check out how your elected representative  voted.

Food Safety Bill Uncertainty

 

 

As we prepare for Thanksgiving, let us be truly grateful that we have not been subject to even more recalls, illnesses and or deaths from unsafe food than are on record. The system set up in the dim past, 1938 to be exact, desperately needs an overhaul. We can still hope that this will be accomplished in the lame duck session. The Senate is going to take up the debate on the Food safety Modernization act (S. 510) after the break. Now that the Tester amendment has smoothed over the issues affecting small farmers,  there may be room for hope. But  as Grist reports there are still those who hold the view that there is no food safety crisis at all! May wiser counsel prevail!

Food Safety Bill in Coma

The Senate will not take up the Food Safety Bill before the members leave for election campaigning. There is a small chance they may take it up at the end of the year or have to start all over again next year. Why did this happen? In the past two years alone, there has been a  steady drumbeat of outbreaks of illnesses related to unsafe food (lettuce, tomatoes, spinach, eggs to name a few) so the urgency is quite clear. Sen. Coburn (Republican of Oklahoma) ) who has opposed the Bill, says we do not have the money to make our food system safe in the face of a huge deficit. Here is an alternative: unsafe food=more sick people=higher healthcare costs=higher premiums for all of us. Add to this the loss in productivity due to time lost in dealing with sickness.This cost is likely to be far higher than the proposed outlay on overhauling the food system. Others have opposed to inspections of farms. Why? There has to be a way to protect consumers from being sold unsafe food, why would anyone object to participating in that system? Also, concerns have been raised over the rights of small and organic farmers and that should definitely be addressed. But it is a crying shame that big money can stand in the way of public health in this country. If you are voting this November or happen to meet the people you voted for, ask them why this is so. Perhaps you could show them this video.

The full text of the Bill is here and some important FAQs here.

The Price of Sustainable Living

The FDA is going through the process of consultations and public meetings to ascertain if a newly developed strain of genetically modified salmon is suitable for human consumption. There are also reports from Europe on the success of breeding the endangered bluefin tuna. The first news was greeted by the usual scary warnings about “fish-zilla” and “frankenfish” while the second has been termed abhorrent because we are breeding the fish merely to satisfy our own greed. Let us set aside for the time being the question of the safety or viability of either technique and consider a very simple  issue: the arrogance of a species that seeks to reorganize the planet to fit its own needs. We have eaten the bluefin to extinction and are reviving them to satisfy our appetites and we are trying to re-engineer the salmon so it grows faster to keep up with our demands.  What if we thought  instead about what we could be doing with humans?  How about moderating our behavior instead? Instead of farming salmon fed on corn, we could we eat less fish and more plants. Or instead of finding spending huge amounts of money trying to breed a species solely to consume them, lets spend instead on creating awareness of the need to stop overpopulating the planet.

This is not fear mongering, we are on a slippery slope of no return so why is there no will to do what is needed? Because, sadly, a sustainable planet is the ultimate public good. We would all like it, no one wants to perish , but we figure there are plenty of others to make the sacrifices, the outcome will not depend on the actions of a single individual so we take the easy path out. So, very few people actually do the right thing and the possibility of a negative outcome grows. These are hard times, we say, give me a break. A break, a bargain, call it what you will, just inches up the price of a sustainable future for our children just that much higher and pulls it that extra distance away from our empty hands.

Think twice before you act and share your concerns with others, remember we need to get everyone to act responsibly.This is a huge task and its going to take a planet to do it.

Egg Farm Inspections

The news is that the FDA is going to send inspectors to large egg farms in an effort to prevent future salmonella outbreaks. So, they finally figured out who needs to look at eggs and that they need to look at the eggs before people start getting sick…..excellent work! It is a tribute to the enormous power of  big money and lobbyists that it took so long to accomplish such simple and obvious measures to ensure food safety and quality.

Eggs-asperating!

Yes, I am referring to the salmonella outbreak and subsequent recall of millions of eggs. As an ardent egg devotee, I am appalled and as a follower of food policy issues, I am outraged. Here is why:

1. The regulations necessary to prevent outbreaks like this have been floating around for a decade when President Clinton was in office but have not been implemented.

2. A simple and cheap way to avoid salmonella is vaccination. It is done in the UK, for example, and the egg supply is very safe. However, it is not mandatory in this country and only about half the egg laying hens are vaccinated.

3. Who was in charge? No one. The USDA is responsible for plants and animals (but not for eggs) and the FDA is responsible for  shelled eggs ( but not for the hens). So the infected hens who laid the eggs are nobody’s business.

4.Is this serving as a wake up call to Congress which is dithering over the Food Safety Bill? No. They are too busy working hard on your time and money trying to prevent banning BPA in plastics to actually pass the Food Safety Bill which would give some teeth to the FDA.

There is more on this issue here: in the New York Times. We all need to educate ourselves on this issue and also communicate our views to the people we elected.

The Great Locavore Battle

It’s on! The battle to define and support /oppose the locavore movement was kicked off today. Stephen Budiansky in his piece for The New York Times, “Math Lessons for the Locavore” while noting that he was all for growing your own veggies, pointed out what he calls the “absurdities” of this trend. The gauntlet was picked up over at Grist by Ken Meter of the Crossroads Resource Center who argued that the locavore movement is crucial to fixing our broken food system. Now, you be the judge! And stay tuned, there is more to come!

Food Safety Bill in the Senate

Consider this: the number of people in this country who die each year from food borne illnesses is the same as the number of Americans who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan since 2003!  Shocked?  So was I when I read this statistic in Eric Schlosser’s piece on the food safety bill in the New York Times.

The Bill under consideration would enable the FDA  to conduct more comprehensive testing, issue recalls, take punitive measures against offenders, and also enforce application of US food safety standards on imported food, among other things. So whats holding it up? Some concerns about increased power of agribusinesses and impacts on small farmers have  surfaced and they can be attended to but mostly it is the usual vested interests: food processors who do not want their boat rocked. It is time to ask: why is the Senate dragging its feet on legislation that would protect lives? We need to act now.